Mohamed Elbaradei, the 2005 Nobel laureate and Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has recently warned that up to 30 nations could possess the means to produce nuclear weapons in a relatively short period of time. What does this say about the alleged "Leader of the Free World"? I recall a time when the US at least paid lip service to its obligation to rid the world of this threat to humanity. It was understood that if other nations were to feel secure and thus refrain from developing nuclear weapons themselves, then the major powers which possessed nuclear armaments would work to reduce and ultimately eliminate their own stockpile.
That all of course went out the window when Bush and his merry band of neo-crazies took power. At once the Bush administration withdrew America from its Salt II treaty obligations with Russia in order to increase and improve upon our weaponized nuclear stockpile--in direct violation of both the letter and spirit of that treaty which had been to seek the elimination of all nuclear weapons. Furthermore, the 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States (NSS) introduced to the world the concept of "preemption". This remarkably provocative concept declared America's "right" to challenge any potential rival to her military supremacy with attack. The 2002 NSS put the world on notice that America reserved to itself alone the right to intervene in the affairs of other nations when its interests were threatened irrespective of the UN Charter and its treaty obligations to the rule of law.
In March 2003, the Bush administration launched an unprovoked attack against a virtually defenseless Iraq on fabricated pretexts as a demonstration of its willingness to follow its words with deeds. What was lost to no one, however, was the fact that of the so-called axis of evil nations (Iran, North Korea, & Iraq), only Iraq--the weakest--was attacked and destroyed. Those with a credible deterrent to US aggression such as North Korea, a declared nuclear power with massed artillery aimed at South Korea and American forces there, and Iran, a viable nation state with the means to utterly disrupt commercial traffic through the Persian Gulf, were not attacked.
As the IAEA's Elbaradei has reasonably implied, US foreign policy has made the world considerably less secure as other nations scramble to obtain a nuclear deterrent to the American hegemon. Thanks Mr. President.
EU risks losing gas supplies from Qatar – energy minister
-
[image: Preview] Qatar may halt gas exports to the European Union if fined
by Brussels under the bloc’s carbon-emission due diligence directive
Read Full A...
1 hour ago
2 comments:
I fear what Bush has set in motion cannot be undone. Nuclear proliferation in the 21st century by third world nations is all but certain. North Korea and Iran are just the tip of the iceberg. It's only a matter of time before some lunatic fringe terrorist organization obtains a thermonuclear device and detonates it in D.C.,New York,Los Angeles or Chicago. Our children face a more dangerous future than we did during the cold war era.
I think it's all beginning to unravel though. Polls across the political spectrum indicate that the Bush agenda is in serious trouble. There is the very real possiblity that the ultra-nationalists will lose their hammer-lock on Congress after the mid-term elections on November 7th. I know it's not much but it could be the start of something better.
Post a Comment