"The wealthy, not only by private fraud but also by common laws, do every day pluck and snatch away from the people some part of their daily living. Therefore, when I consider and weigh in my mind these commonwealths which nowadays do flourish, I perceive nothing but a certain conspiracy of rich men in procuring their own commodities under the name and authority of the commonwealth.

They invent and devise all means and crafts, first how to keep safely without fear of losing that which they have unjustly gathered together, and next how to hire and abuse the work and labor of the people for as little money and effort as possible."

Thomas More, Utopia

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Rare sighting, a hasbarist being subjected to tough questioning

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Al Jazara is the only media out outlet that would even think of bringing this up. Think the Tribune would?
"leftisthebest"

Coldtype said...

This is why the owners of our mainstream media so despise the internet. Shaping perceptions has become exponentially more difficult.

Anonymous said...

Concealed carry is coming!!!!

Coldtype said...

So I've heard. Will see how thing shake out.

Anonymous said...

What will the M-1 population do when CCW comes,including Chicago.I wonder how many Indian,Paki,Korean,Arab shop keepers will be pakin heat.Gorilla man will be on the endangered list soon.
Who will Lefty hand frozen turkeys out to with Father Fagger??

Coldtype said...

CCW cuts both ways doesn't it? The M-1 population has just as much of a right to "stand their ground" as well. I think this is a bad idea and will open a can of worms we won't want to deal with but it will be too late by then.

Try to remember that the possession of a firearm does not offer protection to the bearer just the illusion of such. A soldier on the battle field or a policeman on patrol is not "protected" by his firearm.

Anonymous said...

Try to remember that the possession of a firearm does not offer protection to the bearer just the illusion of such. A soldier on the battle field or a policeman on patrol is not "protected" by his firearm.

11:24 AM

So I guess you dont carry your gat off duty then do you,or plan to after retirement huh???

Coldtype said...

Anon, you didn't really read what I wrote very closely. Me carrying my weapon off-duty doesn't change in the slightest the veracity of my statement. I can still die with my weapon. A gun, in trained hands, is merely a tool that may be of utility in a crisis but there is no guarantee that this will be so as is so often assumed.

Anonymous said...

You still avoid the question Coldy.As long as YOU have yours,thats ok.Then you preach your doublespeak and BS.