"The wealthy, not only by private fraud but also by common laws, do every day pluck and snatch away from the people some part of their daily living. Therefore, when I consider and weigh in my mind these commonwealths which nowadays do flourish, I perceive nothing but a certain conspiracy of rich men in procuring their own commodities under the name and authority of the commonwealth.
They invent and devise all means and crafts, first how to keep safely without fear of losing that which they have unjustly gathered together, and next how to hire and abuse the work and labor of the people for as little money and effort as possible."
Thomas More, Utopia
Tuesday, February 05, 2008
Happy Anniversary!
It's been five years since Colin Powell's bruva performance before the UN Security Council in his role as Team Bush's most credible official. Sitting before the Security Council, his props carefully organized beside him, Powell passionately spun the Iraqi/WMD lies that bamboozled the nation into supporting a war of aggression. Jon Schwarz lays it all out in devastating detail.
5 comments:
Anonymous
said...
"Powell passionately spun the Iraqi/WMD lies that bamboozled the nation into supporting a war of aggression"
Lol, what a laughably retarded statement. First of all, The nation already supported removing Saddam and liberating Iraq. The American people were clamoring for Saddam's removal ever since 1991 when Bush 41 didn't "finish the job". US support for Saddam's removal remained extremely high (70-85%) throughout the 1990s an up until the 2003 Iraq Liberation.
Bush merely enacted the collective will of the American people. Secondly, your claimed "war of agression" is bullshit. Saddam was our enemy, we had every right to remove him, end of story
Let's see, when Powell was saying what the conservatives wanted he was a prince. Look we support blacks in the party, they'd say. Then they would point to Connie Rice. When he didn't say what they wanted he is a jerk.
Where are the WMD's? That's old news. They were not there. The president deceived the American people to go to Iraq. No, make that he out and out lied. History will show us he is one of the worst presidents in history.
WMD was a total irrelevancy. That nonsense was purely for the consumption of the "international community". Who gives a damn about what they think? I didn't need WMD to support an Iraq liberation. I DEMANDED one, despite the presence/absence of WMD....as did a majority of the American people
I can think of at least a half dozen dictators worse than Saddam. Why pick on him? Bush thought we would run through there like a hot knife through butter.
When we finally leave there I give the country three months (tops) before OUR regime is overthrown.
“The nation already supported removing Saddam and liberating Iraq” -“Gen. Pinochet”
Who gives a fuck what “the nation” supported? Was a US attack on Iraq sanctioned by the UN Security Council or conducted in accord with Article 51 (self-defense from imminent attack) of the UN Charter as required by international law? Answer: hell no and that’s all that matters. Just out of curiosity, why wasn’t “the nation”, more accurately those who own and run it, clamoring to “liberate” the people of Iraq when the murderous tyrant was at the height of his power? For example, when he launched his invasion of sovereign Iran in 1980 at the cost (with US assistance) of perhaps one million lives, why did the Reagan administration provide Saddam with diplomatic, economic and overt military support for this clear violation of the UN Charter? When Saddam gassed the Kurds in 1988 after they rose up against him, why did the US shield him from international sanction with its UN Security Council veto?
“…your claimed "war of agression" [sic] is bullshit” -GP
Fascinating. Then perhaps you can explain what Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, our chief prosecutor at Nuremberg, meant when he announced the following at the Tribunal:
An "aggressor” is a state that is the first to commit such actions as "invasion of its armed forces, with or without a declaration of war, of the territory of another State"; and that a war of aggression was, "…the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole” [see: “Just War? Hardly” by N. Chomsky].
“Saddam was our enemy, we had every right to remove him, end of story” -GP
On the contrary you imperial prick, we had no such “right” to invade a sovereign nation, overwhelmingly contribute to the slaughter of over one million of its citizens, create four million refugees, shatter its infrastructure, and set up institutions for the purpose of looting its most important natural resource.
For the definitive exposition of the Team Bush lies that led us to war, take the time to read this report by Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Center for Public Integrity.
'Green News Report' - December 11, 2025
-
Follow @GreenNewsReport... (Or use "Click here to listen..." link below.)
IN TODAY'S RADIO REPORT: U.S. seizes sanctioned oil tanker off coast of
Venezuela...
Government As Helper vs. Government As Regulator
-
Stumbled across this story about how a Chinese province quickly built a
facility based on tech discovered in Europe: So a *European* startup called
IB2 ann...
Busted
-
I am a historic figure like any vicepresident of the United States ever
was,unburdened by what didn’t doing does,lost to past defeat made victor
twice,ente...
البنتاغون يتبنى رؤية ترامب للعالم, بقلم تييري ميسان
-
نشرت إدارة دونالد ترامب الذي يعتبره نظراؤه الأوروبيين رئيساً شعبوياً يفتقر
تماماً للخبرة السياسية، في الرابع من كانون الأوّل/ ديسمبر الحالي،
استراتيجية الأ...
البنتاغون يتبنى رؤية ترامب للعالم, بقلم تييري ميسان
-
نشرت إدارة دونالد ترامب الذي يعتبره نظراؤه الأوروبيين رئيساً شعبوياً يفتقر
تماماً للخبرة السياسية، في الرابع من كانون الأوّل/ ديسمبر الحالي،
استراتيجية الأ...
Extreme inequality – and what to do about it
-
The latest World Inequality Report 2026 reveals the stark cleavage between
rich and poor in the world – a division that is getting wider to the
extreme. Ba...
Your Party, and Its Conference
-
It is probably no bad thing that health struggles have delayed my writing
up Your Party’s extraordinary Liverpool founding conference. Perspective is
def...
Israel, Gaza and the Genocide-Industrial Complex
-
Support my work here and in Jacobin Magazine and The New Arab. Make an
end-of-year donation on behalf
The post Israel, Gaza and the Genocide-Industrial Co...
Future Global Order Pivots on Ukraine Proxy War
-
*October 21, 2025* (NEO - Brian Berletic) - Russian forces in recent weeks
have been increasingly encircling the cities of Pokrovsk in central Donetsk
wh...
Media Say ... Gloom And Doom In China
-
The New York Times, and other western media, are running a 'doom and gloom
in Xi's economy' campaign. The latest entry is this piece: China’s Economic
Pain...
The Great Student Loan Ruse
-
These appalling figures don't fully capture the cruelty of the reality to
which they refer.
The post The Great Student Loan Ruse appeared first on The Co...
Crisis
-
I suppose some people might wonder why I'm not completely hysterical. Why
would I be hysterical? The building where I've lived for 22 years is
scheduled fo...
Open letter to some ex-leaders of the ISO
-
Tess Carter
In light of the revelation of a sexual assault accusation that was grossly
mishandled by once-leading members of the organization, Tess Carter...
Will US global hegemony last for another century?
-
My weekly article for Al-Akhbar: "Will US global hegemony last for anther
century"?
(A critical review of Michael Beckley's new book from Cornell Universi...
Kafka's Castle
-
"That truly Kafkaesque Castle, the modern state." -- Nicos Poulantzas.
*I*. In ‘The Castle’, it is never entirely clear what is happening.
There are off...
Love And Money: Marriage The McArdle Way
-
It's Valentine's Day and Megan McArdle's thoughts naturally turn to love,
which means money. Join me as I mock the woman whose rat-fucking is
screwing ...
Louis Allday, "Controlling the Narrative on Syria"
-
[image: MRZine]Arguably, no war has been more mediated by misunderstanding
than the conflict currently taking place in Syria. This article will seek
to cor...
The Return on My Investment
-
By: Aaron Datesman
It's easy to recognize a win when it comes with a trophy at the end (or, in
the case of politics, an inauguration). It's harder to rec...
And A One, And A Two . . .
-
(From SAVAGE MULES. I keep reading how Bernie Sanders is George McGovern.
Maybe he is.)
*ANTIWAR MULE CAMEO*
As the Nixon era commenced, larger sections...
It's really very simple
-
[Note: I am pushing this article live two days early because ZeroHedge
somehow managed to get a hold of it and post it before I did. Needless to
say, I do...
5 comments:
"Powell passionately spun the Iraqi/WMD lies that bamboozled the nation into supporting a war of aggression"
Lol, what a laughably retarded statement. First of all, The nation already supported removing Saddam and liberating Iraq. The American people were clamoring for Saddam's removal ever since 1991 when Bush 41 didn't "finish the job". US support for Saddam's removal remained extremely high (70-85%) throughout the 1990s an up until the 2003 Iraq Liberation.
Bush merely enacted the collective will of the American people. Secondly, your claimed "war of agression" is bullshit. Saddam was our enemy, we had every right to remove him, end of story
To the general:
Let's see, when Powell was saying what the conservatives wanted he was a prince. Look we support blacks in the party, they'd say. Then they would point to Connie Rice. When he didn't say what they wanted he is a jerk.
Where are the WMD's? That's old news. They were not there. The president deceived the American people to go to Iraq. No, make that he out and out lied. History will show us he is one of the worst presidents in history.
WMD was a total irrelevancy. That nonsense was purely for the consumption of the "international community". Who gives a damn about what they think? I didn't need WMD to support an Iraq liberation. I DEMANDED one, despite the presence/absence of WMD....as did a majority of the American people
To the general:
I can think of at least a half dozen dictators worse than Saddam. Why pick on him? Bush thought we would run through there like a hot knife through butter.
When we finally leave there I give the country three months (tops) before OUR regime is overthrown.
“The nation already supported removing Saddam and liberating Iraq”
-“Gen. Pinochet”
Who gives a fuck what “the nation” supported? Was a US attack on Iraq sanctioned by the UN Security Council or conducted in accord with Article 51 (self-defense from imminent attack) of the UN Charter as required by international law? Answer: hell no and that’s all that matters. Just out of curiosity, why wasn’t “the nation”, more accurately those who own and run it, clamoring to “liberate” the people of Iraq when the murderous tyrant was at the height of his power? For example, when he launched his invasion of sovereign Iran in 1980 at the cost (with US assistance) of perhaps one million lives, why did the Reagan administration provide Saddam with diplomatic, economic and overt military support for this clear violation of the UN Charter? When Saddam gassed the Kurds in 1988 after they rose up against him, why did the US shield him from international sanction with its UN Security Council veto?
“…your claimed "war of agression" [sic] is bullshit”
-GP
Fascinating. Then perhaps you can explain what Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, our chief prosecutor at Nuremberg, meant when he announced the following at the Tribunal:
An "aggressor” is a state that is the first to commit such actions as "invasion of its armed forces, with or without a declaration of war, of the territory of another State"; and that a war of aggression was, "…the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole” [see: “Just War? Hardly” by N. Chomsky].
“Saddam was our enemy, we had every right to remove him, end of story”
-GP
On the contrary you imperial prick, we had no such “right” to invade a sovereign nation, overwhelmingly contribute to the slaughter of over one million of its citizens, create four million refugees, shatter its infrastructure, and set up institutions for the purpose of looting its most important natural resource.
For the definitive exposition of the Team Bush lies that led us to war, take the time to read this report
by Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Center for Public Integrity.
Post a Comment