"The wealthy, not only by private fraud but also by common laws, do every day pluck and snatch away from the people some part of their daily living. Therefore, when I consider and weigh in my mind these commonwealths which nowadays do flourish, I perceive nothing but a certain conspiracy of rich men in procuring their own commodities under the name and authority of the commonwealth.
They invent and devise all means and crafts, first how to keep safely without fear of losing that which they have unjustly gathered together, and next how to hire and abuse the work and labor of the people for as little money and effort as possible."
Thomas More, Utopia
Monday, January 21, 2008
The View Sure Is Good Up Here!
Found a great post on Jon Schwarz's blog today that kind of puts into perspective how people throughout history have rationalized their comparative advantages no matter the means employed. I think you'll find some of the responses in the comments section rather interesting, particularly the apologetics of one "Ashley". Read on.
1 comment:
Anonymous
said...
Do people rationalize their advantages because they have a guilty conscience? I think not. If they indeed felt guilty they would do more to help the poor. Most people think it is owed them even if they did little (or nothing) to deserve their wealth.
Saw an interesting show on Sargent Shriver on PBS the other night. I think he was genieunely concerned about the underclass. The program stated he might have been the v.p. candidate in 1964, but the Kennedy family said Bobby deserved it more so he had to refuse.
Israel escalates destruction of Gaza City
-
Quadcopters are being used to encircle residential blocks and coerce
civilians into fleeing under armed threat, rights group reports.
As to One Untimely Byron
-
I even gave my life to Christ in their parkinglot. My soul a biscuit and
His lovethe pale gray gravy drizzled from above;halfway to Damascus and my
dogs’re...
Ukraine
-
This post initially included a corridor photo which was fake. My fault, but
that made no difference at all to the argument. It will definitely be good
if...
Media Say ... Gloom And Doom In China
-
The New York Times, and other western media, are running a 'doom and gloom
in Xi's economy' campaign. The latest entry is this piece: China’s Economic
Pain...
The Great Student Loan Ruse
-
These appalling figures don't fully capture the cruelty of the reality to
which they refer.
The post The Great Student Loan Ruse appeared first on The Co...
Crisis
-
I suppose some people might wonder why I'm not completely hysterical. Why
would I be hysterical? The building where I've lived for 22 years is
scheduled fo...
Open letter to some ex-leaders of the ISO
-
Tess Carter
In light of the revelation of a sexual assault accusation that was grossly
mishandled by once-leading members of the organization, Tess Carter...
Will US global hegemony last for another century?
-
My weekly article for Al-Akhbar: "Will US global hegemony last for anther
century"?
(A critical review of Michael Beckley's new book from Cornell Universi...
Kafka's Castle
-
"That truly Kafkaesque Castle, the modern state." -- Nicos Poulantzas.
*I*. In ‘The Castle’, it is never entirely clear what is happening.
There are off...
Love And Money: Marriage The McArdle Way
-
It's Valentine's Day and Megan McArdle's thoughts naturally turn to love,
which means money. Join me as I mock the woman whose rat-fucking is
screwing ...
Louis Allday, "Controlling the Narrative on Syria"
-
[image: MRZine]Arguably, no war has been more mediated by misunderstanding
than the conflict currently taking place in Syria. This article will seek
to cor...
The Return on My Investment
-
By: Aaron Datesman
It's easy to recognize a win when it comes with a trophy at the end (or, in
the case of politics, an inauguration). It's harder to rec...
And A One, And A Two . . .
-
(From SAVAGE MULES. I keep reading how Bernie Sanders is George McGovern.
Maybe he is.)
*ANTIWAR MULE CAMEO*
As the Nixon era commenced, larger sections...
It's really very simple
-
[Note: I am pushing this article live two days early because ZeroHedge
somehow managed to get a hold of it and post it before I did. Needless to
say, I do...
1 comment:
Do people rationalize their advantages because they have a guilty conscience? I think not. If they indeed felt guilty they would do more to help the poor. Most people think it is owed them even if they did little (or nothing) to deserve their wealth.
Saw an interesting show on Sargent Shriver on PBS the other night. I think he was genieunely concerned about the underclass. The program stated he might have been the v.p. candidate in 1964, but the Kennedy family said Bobby deserved it more so he had to refuse.
Post a Comment